Substitution

Graphing showed you what a solution is. Now you'll find it exactly, with no graph to read. The trick rests on one fact you already trust: in a system, x means the same number in both equations, and so does y. The two equations aren't strangers. They describe the same pair of hidden numbers.
Think of y as a mystery box with one number hidden inside. Suppose the first equation tells you outright what's in the box: y = 2x. That's not a different y from the one in the second equation. It's the same box, and you've just been told what it holds. So anywhere the second equation says y, you can pour in 2x instead, because they're equal. That swap is substitution.

The payoff is what makes the swap worth doing. The second equation has two unknowns, x and y, and you can't solve one equation in two unknowns. But the moment you replace y with 2x, that equation has only x in it. One equation, one unknown, the kind you've been solving since Unit 2. The crossing point falls out as soon as a single variable is left standing.
The full move, start to finish: isolate a variable in one equation, substitute that expression into the other equation, solve the one-variable equation you're left with, back-substitute to find the partner coordinate, and check both. That last "find the partner" step is the one people skip most, so watch for it.
New words
- 7.2.d1 Substitution: replacing a variable with an expression equal to it. Because each variable denotes the same number in both equations, an expression equal to (say) y in one equation may stand in for y in the other.
Worked example
7.2.w1 Example 1. Solve y = 2x and x + y = 9. Here y is already alone. The first equation tells you the box holds 2x. So in the second equation, wherever you see y, pour in 2x: $$\begin{aligned} &x + 2x = 9 \\ &\Rightarrow\; 3x = 9 \\ &\Rightarrow\; x = 3. \end{aligned}$$ Why this works: x plus 2x is three x's, so 3x = 9, and dividing both sides by 3 gives x = 3. But you're not done. You have x, not the pair. Go back and find y: since y = 2x, y = 2(3) = 6. So the solution is (3, 6). Check both: is 6 = 2(3)? Yes. Is 3 + 6 = 9? Yes. Solution: (3, 6).
7.2.w2 Example 2, isolate first. Solve x = y + 1 and 2x + y = 8. This time x is the one already alone: x = y + 1. Substitute y + 1 in place of x in the second equation: $$\begin{aligned} &2(y + 1) + y = 8 \\ &\Rightarrow\; 2y + 2 + y = 8 \\ &\Rightarrow\; 3y + 2 = 8 \\ &\Rightarrow\; 3y = 6 \\ &\Rightarrow\; y = 2. \end{aligned}$$ Step by step: the 2 outside the parentheses has to reach everything inside, so 2(y + 1) becomes 2y + 2. That's the distributing move from Unit 6, handing a copy to each term. Then 2y + y is 3y, so 3y + 2 = 8; subtract 2 from both sides to get 3y = 6; divide by 3 to get y = 2. Now find the partner: x = y + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3. Solution (3, 2). Check both: is 3 = 2 + 1? Yes. Is 2(3) + 2 = 8? Yes, since 6 + 2 = 8. Solution: (3, 2).
That distributing step is the one to slow down on. It's tempting to write 2(y + 1) as 2y + 1, sending the 2 to only the first thing inside. But the 2 has to greet everyone in the parentheses, so it's 2y + 2. A quick way to catch it: count the terms inside, and make sure the outside number reached every one.
7.2.w3 Example 3, watch the distribution. Solve y = x − 2 and x + y = 10. y is alone, so substitute x − 2 for y in the second equation: $$\begin{aligned} &x + (x - 2) = 10 \\ &\Rightarrow\; 2x - 2 = 10 \\ &\Rightarrow\; 2x = 12 \\ &\Rightarrow\; x = 6. \end{aligned}$$ The x plus another x makes 2x, and the −2 comes along, so 2x − 2 = 10; add 2 to both sides for 2x = 12, then divide by 2 to get x = 6. Partner: y = x − 2 = 6 − 2 = 4. Solution (6, 4). Check both: is 4 = 6 − 2? Yes. Is 6 + 4 = 10? Yes. Solution: (6, 4).
7.2.w4 Example 4, isolate when nothing is alone yet. Solve x + y = 7 and 2x + y = 11 by substitution. Neither variable is alone here, so make one alone first. The first equation is the easy one to rearrange: subtract x from both sides to get y = 7 − x. Now substitute 7 − x for y in the second equation: $$\begin{aligned} &2x + (7 - x) = 11 \\ &\Rightarrow\; x + 7 = 11 \\ &\Rightarrow\; x = 4. \end{aligned}$$ Here 2x − x is just x, so x + 7 = 11, and subtracting 7 gives x = 4. Partner: y = 7 − x = 7 − 4 = 3. Solution (4, 3). Check both: is 4 + 3 = 7? Yes. Is 2(4) + 3 = 11? Yes, since 8 + 3 = 11. Solution: (4, 3). (This same system has a matching pair of y-terms, which makes it a natural fit for the elimination method coming in 7.3. You'll solve it that way too.)
Which equation you substitute into matters too. You isolated y from the first equation, so you pour the result into the second one. If you pour it back into the first, the one you just got it from, everything collapses to something like 0 = 0, which is true but tells you nothing, because you've only said "the first equation equals itself." Always substitute into the other equation.
Here's a clean one to get the method moving before the practice mixes things up. Solve y = 5 and x + y = 8. The first equation hands you y outright, so substitute 5 for y in the second: x + 5 = 8, which gives x = 3. Partner's already known, y = 5. Solution (3, 5). Check both: 5 = 5, and 3 + 5 = 8. When one equation just states a value like that, substitution is almost no work at all.
Check yourself
- 7.2.c1 "In y = 2x and x + y = 9, why is it safe to write x + 2x = 9? What justifies swapping y for 2x?" (Because the first equation says y equals 2x, so they're the same number, and y is the same number in both equations. Swapping equal things for equal things keeps the second equation true.)
- 7.2.c2 "You isolated y in equation one. Into which equation do you substitute, and why not the other?" (Into equation two, the one you didn't isolate from. Substituting back into equation one just restates it as something like 0 = 0, true but empty, so it finds nothing.)
- 7.2.c3 "Make up a system where substitution is clearly the easier method than elimination, and say why." (Any system with a variable already alone, like y = 3x − 2 and x + y = 10, lets you pour 3x − 2 straight in with no rearranging. When a variable is sitting by itself, substitution is the short path.)
(solve by substitution; give (x, y) and verify both)